Rubberband Testickes For Better Orgasm

ALL FOR THE ARTS (III) The three questions

Here I leave the first and second part of the lost article.

2) Second part of article: _______________________________________________________________

does the writer's duty or the right to write what you like ?

Yes, it has the right and duty to write what I want and how you want. It may sound selfish, hard and cynical at the same time. But writing is an example of the life and art, we can not run her over with the real world, keep evolving. Here

morality comes and the writer, his wit, his creativity, his honesty not so much as a person but as an artist. For example, a story that seriously affect someone must be treated in a special way, the writer is committed to at least try to hide the identity. As we said before it may be impossible, but at least I tried. Now, when it condemned the act of stripping privacy?

only be immoral when a story is not hiding these characters, but also help in their identification with the sole intention of reaching a num greater number sales, or is the product of a creative capacity zero. In these cases, regardless of the intent with which the work is made, if it is a gift to the world of an artist, or is pure merchandise for sale and public morbo . Also relates to an artist's creative principle, a kind of necessity, while fun, is a push existentialist who helps to walk through around an imaginary world. Clearly, a person discovering "blatantly" their characters will not be so interested in expressing and walk this path as simple line the pockets of tickets, or feel recognized by the public to feel what they call "fame."

Perhaps, in the final three phases and three questions that can help discern on this topic can also be arranged chronologically on the creative process: Is honest the creative principle of the artist? Is it important, meaningful to the author that what is going to speak is a simple story or morbid? Are pages that deserve to be read by its artistic quality?

And the three questions stay there, for those who play with fiction, for that penetrate it. Writers, readers are, but often we cheated, discovered, will not rest in our stubbornness to distinguish the wheat from the chaff, because we must not confuse freedom with creative license. And they told me when I studied in school, when looked at as shrews poetry in high school or when I aburríay fascinated at the same time the power classes.

FIN. _____________________________________________________________

article

Juan Manuel Rodríguez de Sousa

_____________________________________________________________

Here I leave the first and second part of the lost article.

First part of article:

Second part of article: _____________________________________________________________